<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Essentials Project &#187; Australia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://2002.omega-films.ca/tag/australia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://2002.omega-films.ca</link>
	<description>- Watching the most essential movies of all time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:00:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Movies #0048, #0049, #0050, #0051 &#8211; Mad Max, The Thin Red Line, The Red Shoes, E.T., The Thing</title>
		<link>http://2002.omega-films.ca/2012/01/23/round-up/</link>
		<comments>http://2002.omega-films.ca/2012/01/23/round-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[70s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[80s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[90s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emeric Pressburger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Carpenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Powell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Spielberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrence Malick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2002.omega-films.ca/?p=588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Well, it&#8217;s been a while, hasn&#8217;t it?  I&#8217;ve been a bit busy.  Plus, I&#8217;m lazy.  Okay, it&#8217;s mostly the lazy thing. 
I think it&#8217;s time for me to revisit the Essentials Project.  But before I get started in earnest, here&#8217;s a quick round-up of the movies from The List that I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://2002.omega-films.ca/images/thing.jpg"></p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s been a while, hasn&#8217;t it?  I&#8217;ve been a bit busy.  Plus, I&#8217;m lazy.  Okay, it&#8217;s mostly the lazy thing. </p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s time for me to revisit the Essentials Project.  But before I get started in earnest, here&#8217;s a quick round-up of the movies from <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0764161512?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=2002essenti-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0764161512">The List</a> that I just so happened to have watched over the last few months.</p>
<p><strong>Mad Max (1979)</strong><br />
<strong>Directed by</strong>: George Miller<br />
<strong>Starring</strong>: Mel Gibson, Joanne Samuel, Hugh Keays-Byrne<br />
<strong>First Viewing</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s kind of odd watching Mad Max for the first time, because it was obviously shot on an exceptionally low budget, and actually has very little of what you&#8217;d expect from a Mad Max film (the monstrous, souped-up cars, the outlandish costumes, etc.).  In fact, you&#8217;d be hard-pressed to describe the setting as post-apocalyptic at all, which is odd considering that this film is considered to be of the essential films in that genre.  I think that everything that Mad Max has become known for, aesthetically speaking, actually comes from the sequels &#8212; I also watched Mad Max 2, and it&#8217;s all there: the desolate wasteland and the memorable cars and costumes.  But what about the film at hand?  It wasn&#8217;t bad.  It drags a bit, but it definitely has its moments.</p>
<p><strong>The Thin Red Line (1998)</strong><br />
<strong>Directed by</strong>: Terrence Malick<br />
<strong>Starring</strong>: Jim Caviezel, Sean Penn, Nick Nolte<br />
<strong>First Viewing</strong></p>
<p>Thus far, my experience with the films of Terrence Malick has been one of admiration, but little more.  I liked Badlands and I liked Days of Heaven, but aside from the gorgeous visuals, they weren&#8217;t films that stuck with me for very long after the credits rolled.   Imagine my surprise, then, that between this, Badlands and Days of Heaven, this was my favourite film by far, despite the fact that it is probably the least regarded of the three.  It feels like this material is pretty much a perfect compliment for Malick&#8217;s style, which is not necessarily something I&#8217;d say about Badlands or <a href="http://2002.omega-films.ca/2011/01/23/days-of-heaven/">Days of Heaven</a> (it&#8217;s been ages since I&#8217;ve seen Badlands, so another viewing is probably in order, but in Heaven, it&#8217;s pretty clear that the fairly routine love triangle is the least interesting thing about that film).  Malick isn&#8217;t particularly interested in telling straight-forward stories; in his first two films he tried to do that, and in this one he didn&#8217;t bother.  I think this film is better off because of it.  It&#8217;s completely plotless, and yet it is absolutely compelling throughout, thanks to Malick&#8217;s poetic, oddly hypnotic direction.  The same can be said for Malick&#8217;s recent The Tree of Life, of which I am also a pretty big fan.</p>
<p><font color="white">.</font><br />
<img src="http://2002.omega-films.ca/images/redshoes.jpg"><br />
<strong>The Red Shoes (1948)</strong><br />
<strong>Directed by</strong>: Michael Powell, Emeric Pressburger<br />
<strong>Starring</strong>: Moira Shearer, Anton Walbrook, Marius Goring<br />
<strong>First Viewing</strong></p>
<p>An exceptionally well directed film.  Though it&#8217;s a little slow in parts, seeing the inner workings of the ballet company is kind of fascinating, and directors Powell and Pressburger do a really good job of developing the characters and making them compelling &#8212; even side characters we don&#8217;t necessarily spend much time with.  All of the performances are quite good, though special mention must go to Anton Walbrook as the leader of the company; he&#8217;s pretty mesmerizing in the role.  The film also looks very, very good, with top-notch direction and glorious Technicolor cinematography (the pristine Criterion Blu-ray probably helps in this regard).  Highlights include a hypnotic dance sequence in the middle of the film, and a supremely memorable ending, which has to rank up there as one of the best endings ever. </p>
<p><strong>E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial (1982)</strong><br />
<strong>Directed by</strong>: Steven Spielberg<br />
<strong>Starring</strong>: Henry Thomas, Drew Barrymore, Dee Wallace<br />
<strong>Second or Third Viewing</strong></p>
<p>What can I say about this movie?  It&#8217;s a classic, obviously.  Many consider it to be Spielberg&#8217;s best film, and obviously the man does not have a shortage of great films to choose from.  To me, Raiders of the Lost Ark is &#8212; and will always be &#8212; Spielberg&#8217;s best movie, but E.T. is definitely a strong contender.  It&#8217;s funny, exciting, touching, and downright entertaining; it&#8217;s pretty much everything you want out of a movie like this.  It also features top-notch direction from Spielberg, and some really great cinematography from Allen Daviau.</p>
<p><strong>The Thing (1982)</strong><br />
<strong>Directed by</strong>: John Carpenter<br />
<strong>Starring</strong>: Kurt Russell, Keith David, Wilford Brimley<br />
<strong>Second Viewing</strong></p>
<p>This is a stunningly good movie.  I remembered this being very good; it&#8217;s even better than I remembered.  Featuring perfect direction from John Carpenter (this is definitely among his best films), the film always looks good and does a pretty astounding job of building and maintaining tension.  It&#8217;s also really well acted, and the dynamic between all the characters is always really well done (both before and after shit gets real, and everybody starts questioning who&#8217;s still human).  Ennio Morricone&#8217;s score also suits the material perfectly.  Honestly, I&#8217;m having a hard time thinking of any flaws in this movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://2002.omega-films.ca/2012/01/23/round-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie #0007 &#8211; The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert (1994)</title>
		<link>http://2002.omega-films.ca/2010/01/13/priscilla-queen-of-the-desert/</link>
		<comments>http://2002.omega-films.ca/2010/01/13/priscilla-queen-of-the-desert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[90s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Pearce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugo Weaving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephan Elliott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terence Stamp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2002.omega-films.ca/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Directed by: Stephan Elliott
Starring: Hugo Weaving, Guy Pearce, Terence Stamp
First Viewing
Synopsis:  Three cross-dressing performers go on a road trip when a job takes them into the middle of the Australian desert.
I&#8217;m not sure when I would have watched this film, if it weren&#8217;t for the list &#8212; maybe in a year, maybe in ten [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://2002.omega-films.ca/images/priscilla.jpg"><br />
<strong>Directed by</strong>: Stephan Elliott<br />
<strong>Starring</strong>: Hugo Weaving, Guy Pearce, Terence Stamp<br />
<strong>First Viewing</strong></p>
<p><strong>Synopsis</strong>:  <em>Three cross-dressing performers go on a road trip when a job takes them into the middle of the Australian desert.</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure when I would have watched this film, if it weren&#8217;t for <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0764161512?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=2002essenti-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0764161512">the list</a> &#8212; maybe in a year, maybe in ten years, maybe never.  Despite the fact that I&#8217;m definitely a fan of the three stars (Hugo Weaving, Terence Stamp and Guy Pearce), this was just one of those movies that I wasn&#8217;t in any particular rush to see.  But that&#8217;s one of the main reasons I wanted to do this blog &#8212; to give me an excuse to watch classics that I wouldn&#8217;t have otherwise seen, and to force me to watch films that have been on my &#8220;to watch&#8221; list for forever (such as <a href="http://2002.omega-films.ca/2010/01/07/12-angry-men/">12 Angry Men</a>).</p>
<p>So here we are, <em>The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert</em>&#8230; did the list steer me wrong?  Not really.  Though I&#8217;m not going to be adding this to my list of favourites anytime soon, I&#8217;m definitely glad that I watched it.  Weaving, Stamp and Pearce were all really good (not surprisingly), and the film was quite enjoyable throughout, if a bit slow and meandering in parts (though definitely never boring).  It pretty much plays out the way you think it will (they have fun, they bond, they occasionally encounter adversity from small-minded bigots, which they overcome) but it was well made and very entertaining.  I&#8217;m definitely a fan of road movies, and this is more proof that, with very few exceptions, it&#8217;s pretty hard to go wrong with that genre.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000OPOAKC?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=2002essenti-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=B000OPOAKC"><em>Buy the movie at Amazon</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://2002.omega-films.ca/2010/01/13/priscilla-queen-of-the-desert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

